Search for: "Jones v. Billings" Results 741 - 760 of 1,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
 Canada In the case of R v Jones 2017 SCC 60, the Supreme Court held that text messages may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy even after they have been sent and received. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:23 am by Jeralyn
., Raghu Nayak, Ramn Emanuel, Ari Emanuel, President Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Blair Hull, Emil Jones, Bill Quinlan, Fred Yang, Bill Knapp and Andy Stern, who could have given material testimony on an issue in the case. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The fourth was also introduced last year, in Yenovkian v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am by Frank Cranmer
Richy Thompson, Humanists UK: Rights Removal Bill being resurrected: on the news that the Bill of Rights Bill is to be taken forward after all. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:46 pm by Tessa Shepperson
To the homelessness unit, so their bill goes up to compensate. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am by INFORRM
The first was Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946, [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (03 February 2005) … The Court of Appeal held that it was an abuse of process for the action before them to proceed “where so little is now seen to be at stake”, and duly struck it out. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
This reflected a concern about “large payments of costs, if paying parties regard it as prohibitively expensive to challenge bills of costs” (Chapter 4, 3.33). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The former catcher alleges West gave pitcher Bill Wagner a bigger strike zone in exchange for letting the umpire borrow a vintage car. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
  Letter told the court that the House had “put legislation where its mouth is” – that is, it had “specifically provided bills” demonstrating the purpose for the subpoenas – and it had ratified the subpoenas with an “extremely clearly worded” resolution. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Computer Weekly had a piece “UK Coronavirus Bill relaxes restrictions on mass surveillance powers”. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
BrownDocket: 10-224Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act's express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The main argument -- in terms of controversy and dollars -- centers on how much the firms are billing to prepare their bills. [read post]