Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules" Results 741 - 760 of 3,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2011, 1:53 pm by J.W. Verret
First, I believe that the rule is so fundamentally and fatally flawed that it will have great difficulty surviving judicial scrutiny. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  With respect to the second portion of the Court’s opinion, the “bottom line” is that it helpfully confirms that where CEQA commits the determination of the historicity of resources to the lead agency’s discretion, the standard of judicial review of that determination remains the deferential “substantial evidence” standard. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
In fact, she has a complaint pending before the Judicial Standards Commission and a case on appeal with respect to the rulings by Judge Hudson. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:06 am by Kristof Van Quathem
Standard data protection clauses should always be approved by the European Data Protection Board before being generally declared valid by the European Commission. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:27 am
While there is now little doubt that complex economic and econometric analyses are standard fare in modern antitrust litigation, but there is a dearth of empirical evidence addressing what impact, if any, this complexity has had on judicial decision-making. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Patricia Hughes
The CJC argued it was not a “federal board, commission or other tribunal” within the meaning of section 2 of the Federal Courts Act. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:24 pm by John Jascob
McGee, seeking high court review of Rule 10b5-2, would be expected sometime this week, and it in fact was denied today. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:17 am by Russ Bensing
   The evidence won’t be considered if it’s been presented at some previous judicial hearing. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Jason Rantanen
On the same day, Huawei applied to the SPC seeking an “act preservation” ruling (a judicial action roughly equivalent to an ASI) to prevent Conversant from enforcing the Düsseldorf injunction until the conclusion of the Chinese proceedings. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:06 am by Patricia Salkin
Central to the Court’s ruling was the requirement for a reasoned statement elucidating the basis for the Council’s decision, encompassing factual determinations, legal conclusions, and compliance with applicable standards. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 8:48 am by Larry
The standard is "no worse" treatment and "fair and equitable" treatment. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:30 am by David Oxenford
  In announcing the proposal, the FCC Chairwoman justified the proposed rules based on authority granted by the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act – a view challenged by the Chair of the Federal Election Commission – and under the general “public interest” standard by which agency actions are governed. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:48 am
Courts have split between two standards of review in determining whether an unusual circumstances exception applies; the “fair argument” standard and the “substantial evidence” standard. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am by Dan Maurer
(This is why the rules permit them to seek guidance from their senior leaders and counsel from judge advocates before they do so.) [read post]