Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr" Results 741 - 760 of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2024, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
Facts – Poplar HARCA v Kerr The Claimant (Respondent) was a social landlord, Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Limited. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
  The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:01 am by Charles Sartain
Posted by Charles Sartain Westport Oil & Gas Company, L.P. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:41 am
Orin Kerr at VC has unearthed an old 7th Circuit case, Cady v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
PCAOB by Orin Kerr in The Volokh Conspiracy Transcript of the Oral Argument in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm by Paul Ohm
Orin Kerr has written an interesting post assessing the legality of the search. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:37 am by SHG
When the House Judiciary Committee held hearings on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and whether common terms of service violations should give rise to criminality, George Washington Law Professor Orin Kerr was asked to testify. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:18 am by Catherine Rose
The post Case Preview: Richardson & Anor v DPP appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:49 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Several of my co-bloggers have suggested recently that liberal academics were surprised by the oral argument in the health care cases because they are out of touch with conservative thought. [read post]
Decision In a judgment by Lord Kerr, with whom all other justices agreed, the Supreme Court decided that the ET did have jurisdiction to hear Dr Michalak’s discrimination claim. [read post]