Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
See Leser v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
Yesterday we talked about the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, John Kerr urges the Court to grant review in the property rights case Central Radio Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
The Court heard argument yesterday in Samantar v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
” 1259: Lord Kerr thanks the parties for their submissions and brings proceedings to a close. 1258: Finally, Mr Hoskins QC says the issue of whether there is sufficient evidence to reach a conclusion on certification is unique to the facts of each case. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
This, as Lord Kerr found, was simply wrong. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
If the California state courts share my concerns about overbreadth, they should consider embracing the very sensible rules for search warrants for computer hard drives (in any case, not just those involving journalists) adopted last year by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Equally, the powerful dissenting judgment of Lords Kerr and Wilson is illustrative of growing disquiet about the privacy rights of individuals arrested/investigated but not charged with criminal offences. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
