Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY" Results 741 - 760 of 1,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt: Garcia v Google explainedValentina… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Howard Knopf
When dealing with such low numbers, “anecdotal” observations may be more important than any so-called statistical analysis, which may not even be possible with such little actual data, if the meaning of “tariff” is realistically interpreted. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
  Canada has little or no reason to accept the long-standing USA complaint that it does not do enough to abate counterfeiting. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Piscioneri v Brisciani ([2015] ACTSC 106), the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court found that the owner and administrator of online forumZGeek is liable for discussion on it, and awarded $82,000 damages to a lawyer defamed on the site. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm by Cody Poplin
It would then need to pass another bill approving the cessation of the specific territories and an amendment adjusting the legal boundaries of those territories as set out in the First Schedule. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm by Howard Knopf
It seems to me that it once did so regularly, and it did so indeed in the recent Access Copyright decision re Provincial and Territorial Governments. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am by Jani
This begs the question: how far does your goodwill extend, even if you have no or very little presence in a given territory, due to your goodwill online? [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
After all she was very tired, earned little, and no struggled politically to have a better life. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm by familoo
However this is dangerous territory, for it begs the question of how reliable any trial process based upon oral testimony can ever be (don’t go there – but see some of Mostyn J’s speeches). [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:55 pm
” And while the Boston Marathon bombing got a justifiably significant amount of media attention, there’s also an epidemic of domestic terrorism against American Muslims that’s getting little attention. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:17 am
The courts have power to decide cases — and thus check Congress and the President — but little practical power to enforce their decisions, and none to command the other two branches. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:16 am by David DePaolo
The California Third District Court of Appeals, in Ramirez v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
Judge Jackson starts off by concluding that in the case of computer searches, the government has little special interest in searching computers leaving the United States: The government’s power at the border arises out of the sovereign’s right and need to protect its territorial integrity and national security. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
There is little doubt that the British armed forces are facing significant legal challenges. [read post]