Search for: "Lanham v. Lanham" Results 741 - 760 of 4,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
" Section 43(a) is often enlisted to fill the gap (although it has led to erratic results like Belmora v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
On statute of limitations issues, the court declined to find a presumption of laches for the Lanham Act claim despite some of the initial publication dates being more than 3 years before suit (3 years being the most analogous state limitations period, borrowed by the Lanham Act). [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm by Alex Woolgar
In very brief summary, five Native American plaintiffs initially (and on appeal) succeeded in having certain of the team's trade marks cancelled on the basis that they "may disparage...persons...or bring them into contempt or disrepute", contrary to §1052(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:35 am by Thomas Key
Circuit Court considered the extraterritorial scope of the Copyright Act in light of Spanski v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am by Thomas Key
” Some state laws serving a distinct interest, such as those regarding libel and fraud, may pose a hindrance to the full exercise of the rights afforded under copyright law but do not conflict with the purpose and objective of the Copyright Act; thus, these laws are not preempted by the Copyright Act.Atticus wants the top perchbut he was preempted by EchoIn Bonito Boats v. [read post]