Search for: "Leone v. Leone" Results 741 - 760 of 1,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference” (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Louisiana, 2020). 03/12/2020[Honduras] [Petition granted] [Grave risk of harm defense not established]Leon, v Ruiz,  2020 WL 1227312 (U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, [*2]87-88). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:18 am
Even accepting as true all of plaintiff's allegations and giving it the benefit of all favorable inferences ( see Leon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
Applying Yerodia, the Appeals Chamber of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (“SCSL”) ruled in its Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:25 am by Adam Wagner
Four years ago, the European Court of Human Rights criticised the policy in Hirst v UK, which arose out of the 2002 case of R v Home Secretary ex parte Hirst. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Put in a more elegant way, the Appellate Term decided Garg v Wigler   2012 NY Slip Op 50494(U) Decided on March 20, 2012   Appellate Term, First Department: "Accepting plaintiff's allegations as true, and according them the benefit of every favorable inference, as we must in the context of a motion to dismiss on the pleadings (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we find the complaint, as amplified by plaintiff's verified… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Affording the complaint a liberal construction, accepting the facts alleged therein as true, and according DeMartino the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the complaint fails to plead specific facts from which it can be inferred that [*2]DeMartino was in an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship, privity, or a relationship that otherwise closely resembles privity with the defendants, who were retained to represent… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:24 pm by Schachtman
The new Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence contains a sly reference and endorsement to a book by the two would-be statistics experts who submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Mattrix Initiatives v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dismissal under CPLR § 3211(a)(1) is “warranted only if the documentary evidence submitted conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter oflaw” (Leon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, even if the defendant had been negligent in his representation of the plaintiff in connection with the underlying matters, viewing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), it failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendant’s alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying matters or that the plaintiff would not have… [read post]