Search for: "Long v. AT & T Information Systems Inc." Results 741 - 760 of 1,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 5:03 am
  “Instead, the Invisalign system’s instructions for use provide that the system is unable to treat ‘[t]ooth malocclusion requiring surgical correction,’ which is precisely the type of malocclusion Plaintiff alleges she has. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Developing such international agreements will be challenging, but the alternative is an increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional system for cross-border data requests that benefits no one. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
(The case was entered into the court system under the name Van Valkerburg rather than Van Valkenburg or Quinn, so the briefs use Van Valkerburg.) [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
This isn’t a great ruling for Angie’s List, but Moore still faces a long road to final victory. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  The issues in the appeal were complicated and included questions regarding the time of accrual of the barratry claim and a disagreement over the applicable limitations period, the distinction between void and voidable contract, the interplay of the attorney disciplinary system with the civil justice system, and the ramifications of the rescission remedy for the litigant seeking it. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  The issues in the appeal were complicated and included questions regarding the time of accrual of the barratry claim and a disagreement over the applicable limitations period, the distinction between void and voidable contract, the interplay of the attorney disciplinary system with the civil justice system, and the ramifications of the rescission remedy for the litigant seeking it. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
It was unconscionable to me that that information would end up in the hands of somebody that shouldn't. . . .Watkins v. [read post]