Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am
Lords Phillips and Clarke find that the claim falls within the scope of the State Immunity Act 1978, s 3(1)(a). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that s 12A of the Theft Act imposes strict liability only to the extent that anyone who was party to the taking of the vehicle (and in the immediate vicinity at the time of the injury) commits the offence, whether or not he was driving at the time. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The Secretary of State refused to allow this. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:41 am
Comparison with Holland v HM Advocate [2005] UKPC D 1 does not assist, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was performing a different exercise and its decision reflected the particular circumstances of that appeal. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989).United States v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Lloyd-Jones gave the judgment, with which all members of the Court agreed. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court closely considered the true construction of the 2002 Act in their judgment, stating that the appeal turned upon the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the legislation. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
Lord Hope stated: “They [the ISA] must make their own assessment of the reliability of the evidence. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
They stated (in Fraser (Nat Gordon) v HM Advocate (No. 2) [2009] HCJAC 27 at paragraph 13 that: “[W]e have come to the conclusion that the appellant’s application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council should be refused as incompetent. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
