Search for: "Lynch v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Inevitable Expansion of Religious Sovereignty Claims, (Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 20, 2017).Robin Fretwell Wilson, Unpacking the Relationship between Conscience and Access, (Forthcoming, Law, Religion, and Health in the United States, Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
Because the death penalty is a direct descendant of lynching, the taint of racial discrimination is endemic. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:19 am
As The Court stated; "Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendants were under no obligation to plead, as an affirmative defense, the plaintiff's failure to comply with the statutory notice of claim requirement (see Laroc v City of New York, 46 AD3d 760, 761; Maxwell v City of New York, 29 AD3d 540, 541; Lynch v New York City Tr. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
Lynch, the Court held that a state offense counts as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of Section 1101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act when it has every element of a listed federal crime except one requiring a connection to interstate or foreign commerce. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am by Rory Little
Lynch:  Whether, for immigration removal purposes, a state offense constitutes an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Lynch now are agreed that there should be  one lawyer speaking for the state — Washington, D.C., attorney and longtime Court advocate Theodore B. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 6:21 am
A lot of great commentary on yesterday's decision in Crawford v. [read post]