Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 741 - 760 of 36,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 12:25 pm by Veronika Gaertner
We are grateful to Professor Burkhard Hess (Heidelberg) for the following remarks on the German preliminary reference in case C- 491/10 PPU (Andrea Aguirre Pelz): Mutual Recognition and Fundamental Rights Case C-491/10PPU – Andrea Aguirre Pelz An important preliminary reference has recently reached the ECJ’s dockets: In the case C-491/10PPU the Higher Regional Court of Celle referred to Luxemburg the following questions: Where the judgment to be… [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
For example, if A died leaving a testamentary estate of $100,000 and bequeathed $75,000 to B but also exercised a power of appointment over the remainder of a trust of over $100 million in favor of C where the default beneficiary was D, one can imagine a very costly probate contest brought by D and defended by C, the nominated executor. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
For example, if A died leaving a testamentary estate of $100,000 and bequeathed $75,000 to B but also exercised a power of appointment over the remainder of a trust of over $100 million in favor of C where the default beneficiary was D, one can imagine a very costly probate contest brought by D and defended by C, the nominated executor. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
For example, if A died leaving a testamentary estate of $100,000 and bequeathed $75,000 to B but also exercised a power of appointment over the remainder of a trust of over $100 million in favor of C where the default beneficiary was D, one can imagine a very costly probate contest brought by D and defended by C, the nominated executor. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
For example, if A died leaving a testamentary estate of $100,000 and bequeathed $75,000 to B but also exercised a power of appointment over the remainder of a trust of over $100 million in favor of C where the default beneficiary was D, one can imagine a very costly probate contest brought by D and defended by C, the nominated executor. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
For example, if A died leaving a testamentary estate of $100,000 and bequeathed $75,000 to B but also exercised a power of appointment over the remainder of a trust of over $100 million in favor of C where the default beneficiary was D, one can imagine a very costly probate contest brought by D and defended by C, the nominated executor. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
For example, if A died leaving a testamentary estate of $100,000 and bequeathed $75,000 to B but also exercised a power of appointment over the remainder of a trust of over $100 million in favor of C where the default beneficiary was D, one can imagine a very costly probate contest brought by D and defended by C, the nominated executor. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:02 pm
  Supporters of Bill C-61 such as Industry Minister Jim Prentice cannot make the same claim. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:02 pm
  Supporters of Bill C-61 such as Industry Minister Jim Prentice cannot make the same claim. [read post]
18 May 2016, 3:32 pm
In this context, a partner includes an individual, a C corporation, any foreign entity that would be treated as a C corporation if it were a domestic entity, an S corporation, or an estate of a deceased partner. [read post]
18 May 2016, 3:32 pm
In this context, a partner includes an individual, a C corporation, any foreign entity that would be treated as a C corporation if it were a domestic entity, an S corporation, or an estate of a deceased partner. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:39 am by Simon Chester
Canada (Premier ministre) c. [read post]
31 May 2014, 3:13 am
 in Case C-201/13 Deckmyn [here], and even more time since UK IP Minister Lord Younger announced that adoption of proposed parody, caricature and parody exception had been [indefinitely?] [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
  The court stated: State Farm was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law because it owed no PIP benefits to Ms. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 18 November 2013 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:33 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0122 and DA 10-0123, 2010 MT 184N, T.G.C. and M.C., Petitioners and Appellees, v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:27 am by Laura Sandwell
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 30 September 2013 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Andrew Brockman
No matter what route VA decides, we will keep you up-to-date on any developments.The post Veterans Law Blog first appeared on Legal Help For Veterans. [read post]