Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 3:14 am
I would also direct your attention to Reg S-K, Item 601(b)(10) [material contracts]. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
Brand Journalism, Sponsored Content and the First Amendment Moderator: Scott Dailard, Cooley LLP Mary K. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
The proposal would add a new Item 106(b) and (c) of Regulation S-K and Item 16J of Form 20-F. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
., David B. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case, the absence of explanation, both of the evidence itself and of its late production, makes matters worse. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
B., and P. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 11:01 am
Giuditta Cordero-MossPrivate International Law in Arbitration Elizabeth B Crawford and Janeen M CarruthersThe Incurious Curia Stanislava CernáStát jako ovládající osoba Lucie Dolanská BányaiováJak moc musí být cizí rozsudek vykonatelný? [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:24 am
Which car one chooses is ordinarily a matter of personal style coupled with financial freedom. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 10:15 am
The scenarios have changed from letters (A,B,C) to numbers (I-IV). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Insofar as the European patent has not yet been granted (R 16(1)(b)) this third party may, no later than three months after the decision recognising its entitlement has become final (R 16(1)(a)), in respect of Contacting States designated in the EP application in which the decision has been taken or recognised or must be recognised on the basis of the Protocol on Recognition:(a) prosecute the EP application as its own application in place of the applicant (A 61(1)(a));(b) file a… [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:26 am
DuMont Schauberg Expedition der Kölnischen Zeitung GmbH & Co KG. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
(b) In T 1/97, which cited the two preceding decisions, the notice of appeal was filed in the name of the opponent; there was an inconsistency between the name indicated in the notice of appeal (“Crown Cork & Seal CO”) and the name taken from the appealed decision (“Crown Cork AGM). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
This opposition appeal contains quite a lot of interesting material. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 11:01 am
(b) The decision to add a calling customer to a known bonus programme may be innovative, but it is of an administrative nature and does not require any inventive technical consideration. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
T 162/82 [9]).The […] submissions of the appellant all converge to the question to be examined here, i.e. whether the refusal of the application was a violation of the provisions of A 113(1) EPC 1973 and/or those of A 94(3).[2] In its first objection the ED objected, inter alia, that the subject-matter of claim 1 then on file was unclear (A 84 EPC 1973) because the claim was directed at a method comprising, inter alia, the determination of the point of intersection of a linear object… [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:22 pm
While prompt resolution of your legal matter is our goal, our approach is fundamentally different. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
Pazdro, K. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:36 am
Boyd and K. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:58 am
Co., 43 AD3d 1150; Matter of New York Cent. [read post]
