Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2025, 7:51 am
For example, in our article, Abandoning Trade Secrets, Mark Lemley and I argue that when a trade secret is disclosed to the public or when a trade secret holder fails to continue to derive "independent economic value" from maintaining secrecy, this is analogous to trademark "abandonment. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Foreigners registered very few marks of their own. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 8:14 pm
Lemley, The Modern Lanham Act and The Death of Common Sense. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:22 pm
Nelson along with Mark Lemley were the only two authors with multiple observations in multiple cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
Rebecca Tushnet Bad Spaniels, Deceptive Raptors, and Tiny Hands: The Persistence of Commercial Speech as a Category Jennifer Rothman has done related work, but her focus has been on the different definitions of commerciality across IP regimes; I’m interested in a different question: holding constant the definition of commercial speech as defined by First Amendment jurisprudence, which is basically speech that does no more than merely propose a commercial transaction, does the Lanham Act cover… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Formalism creeping back in: three examples. (1) Dilution—formalistic principle: once we put the label famous on a mark, we don’t do much to restrict the protection of that mark. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:58 am
In their 2023 article The Antibody Patent Paradox, Jake Sherkow and Mark Lemley (an author of Death) call Amgen a “revolution,” but they do not forecast as far-reaching an impact as Gene Quinn. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am
For a discussion of the issues that will be before the Supreme Court please see my interview with Mark Lemley, who is a Professor of Law at Stanford University. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
For a discussion of the issues that will be before the Supreme Court please see my interview with Mark Lemley, who is a Professor of Law at Stanford University. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am
This article returns to an issue that remained unresolved following rich exchanges between Robert Bone and other scholars such as Michael Risch and Mark Lemley. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:25 am
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Depending on the mark (also true of product space, e.g. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
Mark Lemley has extolled the virtue of this provision, but I’ve always been skeptical that it has much utility at all. [read post]
