Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 741 - 760
of 18,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 9:25 pm
False marking based on Merck's marking of its Claritin-D and Dr. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
This is because they extend to cover the word in a multitude of fonts and colours. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:39 am
The registration therefore covers televisions, stereos, and audio and video recorders that may be sold to sound contractors and sound production companies. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 5:02 am
This is clearly a mark of the white gaze. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:52 am
KG (‘Wenz’) filed an application for EU trade mark MOULDPRO. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:40 am
The opposition relied on the earlier EU figurative mark (pictured above) covering goods in classes 9 (including apparatus and instruments all for transmitting, receiving, recording and reproducing audio and visual signals) and 20 (including fitted furniture for housing electrical equipment and apparatus).In October 2018, the Opposition Division partially upheld the opposition on the basis of there being a likelihood of confusion between the mark applied for and the earlier… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
One of my favorite examples of this is my grandfather's old pencil sharpener on my desk at home, which has patent numbers up through its date of manufacture in 1919 marked on the cover. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 3:47 am
The House Science Committee is scheduled to mark up several bills in a session this morning, including HR 3625. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 5:38 am
KP sought a court order from the Munich Regional Court to prohibit TV and MBL from using the term ‘Apfelzügle’ on the services covered by the contested mark. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 3:35 am
If this seems like a déjà vu, it is because it is: indeed, back in 2020 the EU General Court (GC) already considered this question (T-105/19, covered on The IPKat here). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Kotrri (Applicant), successfully defended her trade mark application before the UKIPO for HOUSE OF ZANA, covering “clothing” in class 25, against apparel retailer, Inditex (Opponent). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Kotrri (Applicant), successfully defended her trade mark application before the UKIPO for HOUSE OF ZANA, covering “clothing” in class 25, against apparel retailer, Inditex (Opponent). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:29 am
An Early Day Motion calling for the extension of the FOI Act to cover contracted out public services has been tabled by Labour MP Grahame Morris and co-sponsored by Caroline Lucas (Green), Mark Durkan (SDLP), John McDonnell (Lab), Margaret Ritchie (SDLP) and Peter Bottomley (Con):That this House praises the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for the transparency and openness it has brought to the public sector and the public right of access of information held by central and local… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:29 am
Cheryl BeiseSubstantial evidence supported the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that the mark “AQUAPEL” and design for leather and imitation leather hides, furniture covers, and various home goods was confusingly similar to the mark “AQUAPEL,” registered in standard characters, for different types of home goods, the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
It should be noted that it is not expressly covered by EU Trade Mark Directives. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:52 pm
The battle for BAVARIA as a beer trade mark continues. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 2:17 pm
Our trademark search covers the USPTO’s trademark database as well as Internet databases. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 12:51 pm
Department of Labor recently marked the 10th anniversary of administering the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
When advisors convert or misappropriate funds they often created businesses or other vechicles to serve as a cover for the theft of funds. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:13 am
Section 43(a) covers this conduct, “because otherwise a defendant could escape liability for passing off simply by using another’s mark—a false designation of origin—to establish the equivalency of the other’s mark and the defendant’s new mark, and then shift to using only its new mark. [read post]
