Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 741 - 760 of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
g/mPU·min, which characterizes in claim 1 both proteases (c) and (d), is defined differently in the patent in suit and in document D20. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
It provides concrete, actual-fact-based examples of something that troubled Chief Justice John G. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
Among the contents of the accessed e-mails were communications about [Lazette’s] family, career, financials, health, and other personal matters. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm by Unknown
(E) A test of the hearing and eyesight of the applicant, and of other matters that may be necessary to determine the applicant’s mental and physical fitness to operate a motor vehicle upon the highways, and whether any grounds exist for refusal of a license under this code. (2) (A) Before a class A or class B driver’s license, or class C driver’s license with a commercial endorsement, may be issued or renewed, the applicant shall have in his or her driver record a… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
It could forego cross examination and still raise the matter in its final brief. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Poor skills equal higher costs billed to the clients c. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
But Rehnquist never reported the matter, so the janitor kept his job. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]