Search for: "Matter of Hopkins" Results 741 - 760 of 999
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2012, 6:41 am by Rick Hills
(As Harry Hopkins complained during the First New Deal about states' misuse of federal relief money, "who gets licked? [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:20 am by Steve Peltin
Cases cited in Anfinson In supporting its economic-dependence test, the Supreme Court mentioned "competing lists of nonexclusive factors" that some federal courts use, citing Hopkins v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
Motorcyclists, no matter what the law is, always wear a helmet. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Please forgive the detail but we fear some of those who decide these matters will not be aware of the real practical facts that may seem trivial but we, as practitioners, know make a real difference to the quality of justice. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
However, the fact of the matter is some nursing homes are downright negligent when it comes to exposing patients in their care to serious - and preventable - infections. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
Lawcast 207: Adam Shutkever and Jeremy Hopkins of Riverview Chambers on new legal services delivery Today I am talking to Adam Shutkever, COO of LawVest, which launched Riverview Law in February  – Riverview Law is the trading name of LawVest Limited – and  Jeremy Hopkins, late of 3 Verulam Buildings where he was a clerk. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
"With this decision, a federal judge ruled that public health matters more than FDA's excuses. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm by SO Issues
Original Article 05/31/2012 By Emily DePrang A single mistake when he was 12 landed [name withheld] on Texas’ sex offender list. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am by Charon QC
The Panopticon blog from 11 KBW’s Information Law Practice Group, led by Timothy Pitt-Payne QC, Anya Proops and Robin Hopkins, is a blog I visit often. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:32 pm by Lorene Park
The Supreme Court had reasoned that, no matter the shared goals and methods of the two laws, it would not casually “apply rules applicable under one statute to a different statute” when Congress used distinct language to describe the two standards. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:12 pm by David M. McLain
., Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC; DRI State Representative Janet Spies, Esq., Spies, Powers & Robinson, P.C.; and Young Lawyer Jody Haskins, White and Steele, P.C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 11:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Cornfeld, John Hopkins University Research Scientist and Task Force advisor Dr. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:03 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
The issue of proximate causation should never be decided as a matter of law where reasonable persons could reach different results. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:16 pm by Ritika Singh
” Khalid was supposed to attend Johns Hopkins University on a full scolarship, but he will instead face up to 15 years in prison, says the AP—which seems like a bad trade for him. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:19 pm by Bill Araiza
First, as a general matter (i.e., going beyond the details of Title VII interpretations) it's astonishing how quickly transgender status has come to be seen as grounds for a colorable discrimination claim. [read post]