Search for: "Matter of Kenneth V." Results 741 - 760 of 907
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:05 pm
" Sarl Louis Feraud Int'l v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
A complaint containing factual claims that are flatly contradicted by documentary evidence should be dismissed (Well v Rambam, 300 AD2d 580, 581 [2002]; Kenneth R. v Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, 229 AD2d 159, 162 [1997], cert. denied 522 US 967 [1997]). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
NK QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Sex Offender Found to Have Mental Abnormality Requiring Confinement in Secure Treatment Facility Matter of State of New York v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
In a Manifesto from 9th July 1955 issued in London, Albert Einstein and other leading scientists urged humanity to find peaceful means for the settlement of all matters based on new ways of thinking. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Second Department's decision accepted MHS's argument without elaboration and vacated the order dismissing the petition, writing as follows: A claim for dissolution of a foreign limited liability company is one over which the New York courts lack subject matter jurisdiction (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d 799; Matter of Porciello v Sound Moves, 253 AD2d 467; Matter of Warde-McCann v Commex, Ltd., 135 AD2d 541). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:33 pm
and it starts and ends this way: This matter is before the Court upon remand for consideration of whether the Court should continue a previously granted stay of execution to intervening plaintiff Kenneth Biros in light of Baze v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:27 am
Rick argued the case against well known lawyer, Kenneth Starr, who represented Rakesh Wahi, M.D., the appellant in the matter.Following is a summary and some of the significant points regarding the impact on peer review privileges.Wahi v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:31 am
During the Prop. 8 oral arguments, Justice Ming Chin had asked Kenneth Starr whether the proposal would provide equal protection to same-sex couples, and whether the Court could order it. [read post]