Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 741 - 760
of 883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2011, 2:24 pm
(Orin Kerr) Last week the Fifth Circuit handed down a significant decision on the “private search” doctrine in Fourth Amendment law, United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:59 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr writes about the 11th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
(Orin Kerr) Last week, the Eleventh Circuit decided an important case, United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm
(Orin Kerr) When the Supreme Court handed down Herring v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
Writing for the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a recent concurring opinion by two judges on the Sixth Circuit in a case on remand after the Court’s unanimous decision in Abbott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Randy’s argument is more or less the one Justice Scalia makes in his concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:32 am
Court, 407 U.S. at 313; United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
’ ” See Wyoming v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:43 pm
If you say, as a matter of ? [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:20 pm
(quoting Burroughs v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
” The Volokh Conspiracy’s Orin Kerr responds, noting that “[n]o matter what Supreme Court opinions look like, there will always be someone who criticizes them for not being clear enough. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
That it works matters. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:05 pm
Further, past Supreme Court cases have presupposed understandings of the technology: In Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
And I’m not very interested in a discussion of Fox v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am
Browne v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:23 pm
Source: Justice Kennedy, concurring in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:32 am
(Orin Kerr) The more I participate in discussions on the constitutionality of the indivdiual mandate, the more it feels to me like a replay of last year’s discussions on the Privileges or Immunities Clause on the road to McDonald v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm
” McCulloch v. [read post]
