Search for: "May v. Board of Directors"
Results 741 - 760
of 5,374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
The decision of Phelan J in Tallon v Director of Public Prosecutions [2022] IEHC 322 (31 May 2022) is a recent and important judgment on the scope of the free speech rights protected by Article 40.6.1(i) and Article 40.3.1 of the Constitution. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 3:42 pm
In Mercier v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:26 pm
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm
As Francis Pileggi put it in a May 6, 2015 post on his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation blog (here), Laster’s opinion in Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
The Federal Circuit’s decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 12:04 am
Qualification for officeReeves v County of Onondaga, 89 N.Y.2d 901The New York State Court of Appeals ruled that if an individual is qualified to be appointed to the board of directors of the Central New York Regional Market Authority at the time of appointment, he or she may continue in that position even if he or she does not meet the qualifications at a later date. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
Supreme Court case California v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:19 pm
” As important as the quarterly review itself is that directors should “create a clearly written record of their review and their vigilant response to any compliance risks that may emerge. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
This was the case in Risberg v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
A recent derivative action brought by a shareholder of a company against its director for breach of duties, in the matter of Rajeev Saumitra v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 6:00 am
Board of Rabbis of Northern & Southern California, 2017 U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:27 am
In Ruggiero v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
In evaluating these requirements, it is important to keep in mind that, no matter how moderate eligibility or procedural requirements may be, shareholder nominees must still meet the demanding test of getting elected before they can join the board. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:31 am
In approving the Nasdaq rule in August 2021, the SEC observed that while the proposal may have the effect of increasing board diversity, it does not require any particular board composition. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:46 am
The governing case on the matter of decisions by cooperative boards is Levandusky v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
Shareholders Litigation, which: (1) dismissed claims that the Comverge board of directors conducted a flawed sales process and approved an inadequate merger price in connection with the directors’ approval of a sale of the company to H.I.G. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:39 pm
On May 9, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated five opinions as “precedential”—the most significant of the four labels that the agency attaches to its administrative decisions. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 7:50 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:59 am
The Director did so and then filed a motion for remand. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
This became known to the Port's board of directors and the commissioners of the municipality of Rotterdam when the RDM subsidiaries went bankrupt and their remaining activities appeared to be insufficient to cover the loans. [read post]
