Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Otherwise the text may be accessed here. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:44 am
Relevance of Social Security Administration Decision The Court noted that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for Social Security evaluated Nagy’s medical record, expert testimony and testimony of Nagy and found him disabled. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:18 am
In 2012, the United State Supreme Court dealt with rights of a posthumously conceived child to the Social Security survivor’s benefits of the deceased parent in Astrue v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
Since then, the American people have united behind a policy of mitigation strategies, including social distancing, to flatten the curve of infections and reduce the spread of SARS--CoV--2, the virus that causes COVID-19. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Righting for the Supreme Court Majority, Justice Kennedy explained that ERISA expressly pre-empts “any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:27 am
& Social Change 433, 505-27 (1992); Neal P. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm
The surviving spouse may not claim Social Security benefits. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 4:02 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Similarly, the Supreme Court has ruled that Americans have no constitutional right to Social Security benefits. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
This Act may be cited as the ``Hong Kong Safe Harbor Act''.SEC. 2. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
D.O., 17-17, involves whether potential beneficiaries of foster-care maintenance payments under the Social Security Act have an individual right to such payments that can be enforced through 42 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
” I can understand that some may contest those findings. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:31 am
The question in Malloy v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:05 am
(quoting Social Security Ruling 85-28). [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
Only three independent agencies, it states, seem to be governed by one person who cannot be removed for cause: “the Social Security Administration, the Office of Special Counsel, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:07 pm
§ 1395y(b)(2) and § 1862(b)(2)(A)(ii) (Social Security Act). [read post]
