Search for: "McIntyre Law" Results 741 - 760 of 766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
Georgia has its own state RICO law modeled after federal RICO but is much broader. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
Georgia has its own state RICO law modeled after federal RICO but is much broader. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
McConkey, our Supreme Court, abolishing the doctrine of implied assumption of risk, noted that ‘it would be ironic indeed if, after abolishing the all-or-nothing proposition of contributory negligence in McIntyre [v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (Spicy IP), Aspen pays £170M for IP rights to Eltroxin, Imuran, Lanoxin and Zyloric: (Afro-IP), Year after settling global patent feud over smallpox vaccine, Barvarian Nordic sues Oxford BioMedica over patents related to same virus: (IP Law360), Australia: Age reports former GSK executive’s victory in court action brought by GSK alleging he started a competing business using GSK’s confidential information: (IPwar’s), Brazil: ANVISA to review Brazilian pharma… [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by INFORRM
Summary judgment is appropriate where `the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
Va. 2003), where that court stated that it intended “to avoid having our legal analysis of our [class action] Rules amount to nothing more than Pavlovian responses to federal decisional law. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am by James Hamilton
Mike McIntyre (R-NC) that would adjust the emerging growth company definition for inflation, resulting in providing more flexibility for businesses.The Act provides temporary regulatory relief to small companies, which encourages them to go public, yet ensures their eventual compliance with regulatory requirements as they grow larger. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 343-44 (striking down regulation that "applie[d] even when there is no hint of falsity or libel"); Grimmet, 59 F.4th at 692-93 (First Amendment "forbids" [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Call McIntyre Law to start your case today! [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
And there is no First Amendment exception or California anti-SLAPP law exception for 13 Reasons Why. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 3:14 am by INFORRM
Sections 168 and 169 of the 2015 Act substantially codify the common law principles concerning the courts’ powers relating to costs in civil proceedings (Word Perfect Translation v Minister for Public Expenditure & Reform (No 2) [2021] IESC 19 (24 March 2021) [4.2] (Clarke CJ; O’Donnell, MacMenamin, Dunne and O’Malley JJ concurring); in particular, section 169 provides for the traditional rule that costs follow the event. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
' 36 American Criminal Law Review 87-116 (Winter 1999) at p. 91]. [read post]