Search for: "Michael C. Dorf" Results 741 - 760 of 903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
” Additional coverage of the oral arguments comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Pete Williams of NBC News, Mike Dorf at Dorf on Law, Brett Norman of Politico, Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers, Jesse J. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf explores “what’s at stake in the case,” noting that it “is not the first legal interaction between domain names and trademarks. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Nabiha Syed
At C-SPAN (video), several law professors discuss the October Term and discuss key cases. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I don't know whether this anomaly is intentional but it is difficult to come up with a sensible rationale for it.Part (c) further provides that in cases that qualify for a three-judge panel and a nationwide injunction, there is a right of appeal to the Supreme Court--that is, the Court must hear the case on the merits rather than exercise discretion whether to review the judgment, as when considering petitions for certiorari. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
My husband and fellow law professor Michael C. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am by Joshua Matz
Professor of Law Director of Clinical Legal Education UC Davis School of Law Rosalind Dixon Professor of Law University of New South Wales Michael Dorf Robert S. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:11 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Her most recent book, Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights (co-authored with Michael C. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
That is, had Yocca wanted to stop being pregnant without killing the fetus, she could in theory have done so, since the fetus was evidently viable.This is the work that fetal viability does, as Michael Dorf and I discuss in our book, Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
" Commentators mused about Twombly's impact: our own Marty Lederman queried here whether Twombly "signal[ed] the rejection of notice pleading" altogether, Scott Dodson raised the prospect that "the Court [was] saying that Rule 8 requires ‘notice-plus' pleading"; and Michael Dorf described a "rough consensus" "that there's no way to understand the decision if it doesn't apply a… [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
’” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf argues that “[i]f Congress accepts the invitation to rewrite the Lanham Act to forbid trademark registration of profanity as such, the Court should close the door it left open in Iancu[:] Profanity can coarsen our public discourse, but regulating it risks still greater damage. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Her most recent book, Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights (co-authored with Michael C. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Steve Vladeck (now at Texas), Michael Dorf (Cornell), and Marty Lederman (Georgetown). [* * *] I've been hearing some buzz about whether House Speaker John A. [read post]