Search for: "Miller, v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2023, 4:20 pm
United States, the court will consider whether the federal indictment against Capitol Riot defendant Joseph Fischer substantiates a charge under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
The state had previously attempted to execute him by lethal injection in 2022.With Miller’s death, this country has now executed 1,600 people since the United States Supreme Court revived capital punishment in its 1976 Gregg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 4:02 pm
Adkins; Professor Miller’s comments; Supreme Court on the March; Supreme Court docket sheet. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:47 pm
" According to one newspaper of the day, the Act sought to provide territorial inhabitants the "immunities and privileges of citizens of the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
UPDATE: The D.C. government's motion for a stay indicates that an appeal to the Supreme Court would include these questions: "(1) whether the [Circuit Court] panel decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Miller, Carol Rittner, John K. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
United States, 2018 U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:44 am
United States of Am. ex rel. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Miller (1993), 13 O.R. (3d) 745 (Ont. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Iqbal is a 2009 decision of the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) that may have an impact on the standard applied to motions to dismiss in state courts with rules that are modeled on the federal rules. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am
Nahid Nassiri v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
Among the lower courts which, according to Heller, placed “erroneous reliance” on an incorrect interpretation of Miller, was the 2nd Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
No. 234, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:44 am
EvidenceProf Blog notes that in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Ainsworth, Amicus Curiae Brief: Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
This claim failed in court — most famously in Flood v. [read post]
