Search for: "Mr. X" Results 741 - 760 of 2,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
  To this end, lawyers representing claimants are very familiar with the authorities such as X v Y which greatly limit the scope for human rights arguments in the dismissal context. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
Supreme Court hosts London launch of ChIPs with call to action to advance women in tech, law and policy I Br*x*t and brands – out of the EU in 680 days I In memoriam: Adolph Kiefer, Olympic gold medalist, innovator and inventor extraordinaire I Digital copies, exhaustion, and blockchains: lack of legal clarity to be offset by technological advancement and evolving consumption patterns? [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 10:55 am by Kenneth Anderson
 It’s one thing to accept the general principle, and another to have adopted a legal view, not just in general, but specifically on legal topic x (IHRL re right to life) in relation to legal topic y (LOAC re law of targeting), in highly specific factual circumstances z. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
As a result, the highest civil court ordered the transfer of the marks to Mr X on the basis of Article 712-6 of the IPC. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:28 am
The patent was the subject of a decision of Mr Justice Arnold [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat), which the Kats pawed over here. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The only bug report is Mr Gold’s. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:37 am by Elizabeth Kruska
  On Friday, Congress makes X a crime, and Jim is charged with X and found guilty and sentenced. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:24 am
“On import, valid permits are required for all cargo entering our port checkpoints - if necessary they will be subject to X-ray screening and radioactivity checks,” he added. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:34 pm
"Since his impressive first-round victory on Sunday, Mr Macron is still at least 20 points ahead, which sounds an unassailable lead.... [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:25 am by Ronald Mann
” She went on to elaborate: [U]sually when we think about ambiguous phrases, … we can say [that] you could say this sentence and then [the phrase] would mean X. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
On appeal, the Federal Court of Justice upheld the Federal Patent Court's decision (X ZR 119/14 of 31 January 2017).New book for the preparation for the Pre-Examination of the EQETian Lu reviewed “A Self-Study Guide for the Pre-Examination of the EQE – Part I: The Legal Questions” by Cees Mulder. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:26 am
Court of Appeals in San Francisco which found FilmOn X, LLC, to be a “cable system” that was eligible for compulsory licenses under the Copyright Act. [read post]