Search for: "Murphy v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 2,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2014, 6:33 am by Todd Lebowitz
  Murphy subpoenaed driver’s license photos from state bureaus of motor vehicles and assembled a team of five “race raters” who visually inspected the photos and assigned each individual a race. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams maintains that “[r]egardless of what Congress and the States do with sports gaming” after the court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
The First Department clapped back at the Second Department in Estate of Murphy, v New York City Hous. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:43 am
The First Department clapped back at the Second Department in Estate of Murphy, v New York City Hous. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:34 pm by Darius
Does the law need to be changed as a result of the Dublin Archdiocese Report on Child Sexual Abuse (the Murphy report, 2009)? [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
In Giaimo, the trial court adopted the hearing officer’s recommendation to apply a so-called “Murphy discount” — named after Murphy v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 8:31 pm by Josh Blackman
The states gave Clement a flat fee of $250,000 to be shared by the twenty-six states. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Murphy v Herfort, 428 NY2d 117, is an example of litigation resulting statements contained in communications between administrators; Missek-Falkoff v Keller, 153 AD2d 841, is an example of a case where one employee sued another employee because of the contents of a memorandum from the second employee to a superior concerning a “problem” with the coworker.As alternatives to claiming absolute immunity or qualified immunity, a public officer or employee… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Murphy v Herfort, 428 NY2d 117, is an example of litigation resulting statements contained in communications between administrators; Missek-Falkoff v Keller, 153 AD2d 841, is an example of a case where one employee sued another employee because of the contents of a memorandum from the second employee to a superior concerning a “problem” with the coworker.As alternatives to claiming absolute immunity or qualified immunity, a public officer or employee… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm by Richard Murphy
 As the Supreme Court stressed in Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Patrick Gregory discusses how the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]