Search for: "New v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 107,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 6:53 am
Supreme Court as oral arguments begin today in the case of South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:17 am
” * Article V, §2 of the State's Constitution provides that "There shall be not more than twenty civil departments in the state government, including those referred to in this constitution. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:12 am
Last week, I commented on United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO, Utica Professional Firefighters Assn. v New York State Pub. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO, Utica Professional Firefighters Assn. v New York State Pub. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:04 pm
In Meredith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
“First, in …The post The Supreme Court reverses death sentence for State inmate because of violations of Batson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:10 am
New Article: Matt J. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:49 pm
The post State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 6:06 pm
“Understanding the New Obamacare Decision, Texas v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 12:44 pm
“Understanding the New Obamacare Decision, Texas v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 11:44 am
“The Justice Department’s New Brief in Texas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
The legislation, which was modeled from provisions in an existing State contract, would have more broadly opened the door for delay claims, beyond the narrow exceptions set forth by the New York Court of Appeals in the seminal case Corinno-Civetta Construction Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:47 am
Yesterday we filed this cert. amicus brief on behalf of the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys and the National District Attorneys Association in No. 08-1065, Pottawattamie County, Iowa v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:01 am
State Farm filed its promised post-judgment motion in Broussard v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
Today, the Solicitor General filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
