Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am
Chamber of Commerce argue that the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower statute requires the plaintiff to prove the employer’s retaliatory intent. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:42 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
This also called into question the integrity of the jury’s verdict on liability, requiring a new trial on all issues (Sharkey v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:14 pm
Chepurko v. e-biofuels, LLP, et al. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:23 pm
In New Mexico State Investment Council v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:38 am
On May 3, the Ninth Circuit ruled in Tides v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 11:50 am
Glazer Capital Management, LP v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:00 pm
My bottom line: If the Supreme Court decides California v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:26 am
SEC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
In City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:50 am
S. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:47 am
Halliburton decision in September 2011 in which the ARB adopted a broad interpretation of the anti-retaliation provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:54 am
In Murray v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:40 am
The Second Circuit created a split by holding in Berman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:11 am
In 2015, a divided Court said in Yates v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:13 am
In Bilski v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Koss to reimburse Koss $242,419 in cash and 160,000 of options pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm
In Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
Evans v. [read post]
