Search for: "P D
v.
Review Board"
Results 741 - 760
of 838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Supp. 522 (D RI 1985); Legree v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
Alvey raises three issues for our review. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
Review Board, and Brad A. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
(Morales v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO releases ‘FY2008 Performance and Accountability Report’; claims success despite backlog (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) USPTO transition team appointed (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Member states review key copyright issues (WIPO) (IPKat) (Daily Dose of IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) CFI rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Class 46) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Law360) Patent policy to be investigated by… [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Reynolds & Brannon P. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IP Think Tank) WIPO working group to reconsider rules on appellations of origin (Intellectual Property Watch) Economic downturn hits trade mark filings (Managing Intellectual Property) Global - Patents Dynamic tools for innovation management (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for invention review (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for publication clearance (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for trade secrets (Securing Innovation) Eureka! [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
Case Name: Board of Professional Responsibility v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b). [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
P. 26(b)(5)(B). [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
P. 26.2 and 16(a)(1)(F) mandate discovery of statements and polygraph results, respectively. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:33 pm
Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce (NFP) - "Nailah D. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
As a result, only the most geographically concentrated outbreaks would have garnered enough attention to prompt further investigation (Keene et al., 1991 p. 583). [read post]
