Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 741 - 760
of 4,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2011, 5:37 pm
Last week, I discussed Kamakahi v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:16 am
" "Courts have long recognized that the First Amendment protects online anonymity and have established a stringent standard to use in precisely this scenario, where a litigant seeks to unmask users for the purpose of providing evidence in litigation that does not involve those users... [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
(Balsam v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
EFF cited a 6th Circuit case, US v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:46 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:15 am
The Texas Supreme Court declared in 1994, in the case, Union Bankers Insurance Company v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:23 pm
Shamesh v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:58 pm
Davis won in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:55 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm
Phillips12-544Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit conflicted with the “reasonable likelihood” materiality standards of Napue v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In Taradejna v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
He proceeded to the basement using an elevator. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 1:58 pm
Dandamudi v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:55 pm
You can check out the precise language of the patent claims at issue here, but in short, Prometheus’ patents consist of the following steps: (1) administer a drug to a patient; (2) determine the effect of the drug by measuring the resulting metabolite levels in a patient’s blood through a standard test; and (3) think about whether to increase or decrease the drug dosage in light of how the patient responded. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Two recent federal district court decisions involving computer “spoofing” scams highlight the uncertainty about whether such incidents may be covered under standard “computer fraud” provisions in widely used crime insurance forms. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Back to Jones v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Again, developments in state capacity to fight crime (and the capacity of criminals to commit crimes) probably had more to do with the development of probable cause under the Fourth Amendment then the precise common law standard when state bills of rights were ratified or common law practice as described in dusty English texts.Entick v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:00 am
On August 18, 2023, the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc in Hamilton v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:42 am
Bennett v. [read post]
