Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court"
Results 741 - 760
of 942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm
The Superior Court granted the petition for habeas corpus and the California Court of Appeals reversed. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Superior Court (1998) 19 Cal.4th 332, 340; Best Interiors, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Superior Court (1998) 19 Cal.4th 332, 340; Best Interiors, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
There’s no chance that I’ll be on that jury, because there’s no chance of me voting to convict, unless the penalty is an afternoon spent picking up trash in the park. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Ag-Supply; Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 11:40 pm
The four parked across the street, Mr. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm
Superior Court of Cal., 480 U.S. 102, 113, 107 S. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:26 am
Superior Court Judge Wendel E. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:42 pm
Supreme Court held in in Apprendi v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
Breyer voted to allow the park and ban the courthouse display. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:27 am
Read the decision at: Ehler v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
(California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:45 am
This was a long, long time ago, and if I’d been smart I would have talked about how the court should defer to the trial judge, who had a superior opportunity to gauge the credibility of the plaintiff and her doctor on that point. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm
NEWS: Perry et al v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:29 am
In the recent three-judge panel decision in Scampone v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 8:43 am
" Barrasso v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 10:14 am
., A-3265-08T2, July 29, 2010: Rule 2:2-3(a)(1) provides in pertinent part that “appeals may be taken to the Appellate Division as of right from final judgments of the Superior Court trial divisions. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
[Lewis v. [read post]
