Search for: "People v Legall" Results 741 - 760 of 31,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a scathing decision in Abdulaali v Salih, he stated, 1. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 4:03 am by INFORRM
In the case of Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864 (QB) Males J held that the right of a claimant to name the people who abused her prevailed over the rights of the perpetrators and others to private and family life. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And the legal system would be opaque to them, in a way that it is not when people from other religious communities are the litigants. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
It also buttressed the institution of slavery by closing off one of the few legal avenues through which people in bondage could seek their freedom. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by Jeff Redding
  I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
At a minimum, it's a very extreme example of accomplice liability, and may well end up being legally over the line as well. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 8:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The legal team was led by Nicole Friederichs, Director of Suffolk’s Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples Clinic, along with Suffolk Law Adjunct Prof. [read post]