Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
Lord Leggatt handed down the unanimous judgement in favour of the appellant Google LLC: “the claim has no real prospect of success. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
See also Johnson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A crowd question from what was apparently no less than a member of the House of Lords reminded us of the political charge of the Brexit debate (and enabled this foreigner to check off meeting a Lord from his London Visit To-Do List). [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:52 pm
It's too good for these people. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:55 pm
It states that the total assets 'amounted to £4 million', and continues: "Use of White v White etc authorities not helpful in a case in which barely enough to cover needs" (my emphasis). [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 1:46 pm
Some of the nicest people I know are law professors. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
Northern Ireland District Judge acquits Pastor of “gross offence” against Muslims – Rosalind English
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm
His passion and enthusiasm for his subject caused him to, so to speak, “lose the run of himself” [20] The Handyside freedom of expression test, as applied by Lord Bingham in Director of Public Prosecution v Collins [2006], was whether the defendant, in exercising his right to say things or express opinions which offended, shocked or disturbed one or more sectors of the population, use language which was “BEYOND THE PALE” of what was intolerable in… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:23 am
She interpreted “family member” generously to include people unrelated by consanguinity or affinity. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
One of the best known examples of this point of view was that advanced by Lord Woolf in A v B plc [2003] QB 195, (the Gary Flitcroft case), in which he argued that ‘any interference with the press has to be justified because it inevitably has some effect on the ability of the press to perform its role in society. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Two energy companies have also been fined £250,000 by the ICO for bombarding people and businesses on the ‘do not call register’ with unsolicited marketing calls. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am
That people can go back on what they have said they will do in letters. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) In Pucci v. [read post]
