Search for: "People v Paine" Results 741 - 760 of 3,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
The prize -- to remind readers -- is complimentary registration, complete with a free lunch, at CLT's conference this Wednesday, 29 October, "Intellectual Property: the 'no patents' round-up for non-techie people", organised by CLT and held in Central London [it's still not too late to sign up for this joyous event, even if you're not the winner of this competition ...].The pain. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
They may seem large compared with comparable awards for pain and suffering in personal injury cases. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:01 pm by Joe Patrice
Small government does usually smart, as in “cause a sharp, stinging pain. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 7:25 am by Ilya Somin
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:19 am by Howard Friedman
We condemn the Supreme Court’s activist decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
Additional Resources: Spring Break party packed with 400 people ends with one dead, four hurt, March 21, 2016, By Mike Clary, Sun Sentinel More Blog Entries: Rish v. [read post]
According to the lawsuit, the law violates constitutional rights and also violates the precedent set by Roe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
Reporting on the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of Michael Dean Overstreet v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:23 am by SHG
The trick here is to reframe the question from accused v. accuser to weak woman v. powerful man. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, certain employers (that employ more than 50 people) must allow people time off to care for "serious medical conditions. [read post]