Search for: "People v. Burns" Results 741 - 760 of 1,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, this is what happened in Governors Ridge Office Park Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
If the government wanted to ban physical objects with electronics and moving parts when they contained (or displayed) pictures of Mohammed, or of a burning flag, or of white people in blackface, that would violate the First Amendment because the restriction is applied because of what the physical objects communicate to people. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Judge Johnson wrote the lower court opinion in Hardwick v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At Rewire.News, Katelyn Burns calls the story of “Kelly Gregory[, who] is a Tennessee resident living with stage 4 terminal breast cancer[,]… emblematic of what is at stake for many people in the United States when it comes to health care, and that’s exactly why Sens. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
In today’s case (Dueck v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
There are varying classes of people subject to the ban. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
As months of a painful COVID-19 lockdown gave way to incandescent fury over the killing of Floyd and the violent response of the Minneapolis Police Department towards the initial protests, a few people went as far as burning police precincts or destroying upscale shopping districts. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court and other institutions of American government and civil society were largely timid in the face of McCarthyism.With the civil rights movement, progressives embraced free speech, but even then, it was not until 1965, in Lamont v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 1:59 pm by Hannah Kris
Sixteen people were killed in the assault, and 40 were hospitalized. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
The tendency of speech to offend people is not treated as a secondary effect, and neither is the tendency of speech to cause harms that flow from such offense — for instance, potential fights, R.A.V. v. [read post]