Search for: "People v. Holmes" Results 741 - 760 of 765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
His view may be that Adarand and Loving v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
The winner of my request for the Llewellyn-like opinion about stopping people is smcelhaney, who pointed me to Judge Pratt's dissent in the 2nd Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
As Bruce Ackerman's Holmes lectures show (120 Harv. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:50 pm
This is Part Four of my review of Bruce Ackerman's Holmes Lectures, "The Living Constitution," 120 Harv. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
This is Part Three of my review of Bruce Ackerman's Holmes Lectures, "The Living Constitution," 120 Harv. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Grass -- Carl Sandburg When War Was Heroic, Two Memorial Day Addresses by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., brought to us by the Law Librarian Blog. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:23 pm
Wright, Antitrust Analysis of Category Management: Conwood Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
The justices of the Supreme Court have historically included people who seemed, even during their service, to be genuine visionaries. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 11:01 am
" This is the orthodox view of the treaty power, articulated most famously by Justice Holmes in Missouri v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874-1932 2 v. (1942) Holmes, Oliver Wendell; Pollock, Frederick; Howe, Mark De Wolfe (Editor). [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
  The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
  Whereas modern law generally guarantees rights that are standing features in society, the law in antiquity did not affect the everyday relationships of people unless they were harmed in specific ways. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:32 pm
Familiar examples, to name just a few, include Justice Harlan's famous dissenting opinion in Plessy v. [read post]