Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 741 - 760
of 39,597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Judgment entered in Maverick v. Harper in accordance with "innocent infringement" measure of damages
27 Oct 2008, 4:40 pm
In Maverick v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:15 pm
Plus, it's a horrifying case, and involves a group of foreign (Russian and Lithuanian) nationals who kipnap, hold for ransom, and kill a bunch of wealthy people and their associates. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:26 pm
Don't kill people. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm
In People ex rel. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
Have a wonderful remaining 2009, and may 2010 be even better. - Shaun [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:09 pm
Though, at the time, it may seem wasteful. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:30 am
The name of the case is UMG v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:44 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
Supreme Court ruling in Mensing v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:09 am
The post Child Support Bullets Part 13: Family v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
" Otherwise the gynecologist is also guilty, for they surely perform the physical movements of the act, and voluntarily so.The erroneous instruction here may well be harmless, because there was no evidence that Mr. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
(Thankfully: It's a sunny 80+ degrees and sunny here in San Diego, and is one of those February days that makes me thankful to be alive -- and in SoCal.)But just because the California judiciary may be (officially) taking a break doesn't mean I can't tell them that they should take on some extra work. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
The theme for today's opinions from the California Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit may revolve around the duality of man.Take Daniel Landry. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
But I think it's a tough question how far the police are able to go when all they have on you is that you're carrying a personal amount of weed, which may well be -- and in the vast majority of case, is (I suspect) -- legal under California law. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
To use his words: "Foreign objects may be of varying degrees of size, shape, or texture, and thus present potential dangers to a minor’s genitals or anal opening greater than simple consensual intercourse. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
In this case, shorter and simpler may have also been better. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:47 pm
It instead elected to obtain this information in two parts; first, by asking for the numerator (the number of people who got loans), and then (presumably) asking for the more discrete denominator (the number of people who applied for them -- as opposed to the number of people who got letters, which we already know) later. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:50 pm
Regardless of the fact that there may well be lots of people named "Jose A. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:48 am
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
