Search for: "People v. Stamps"
Results 741 - 760
of 816
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2009, 8:56 pm
_See Clausnitzer v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
"Then there's the anti-hippie ordinance (which prohibited people from sitting in a park at Carmel-by-the-Sea), which the California Supreme Court struck down in 1971 in Parr v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
See City of New York v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
.), in Ravenwood v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:39 am
Over at the Art Law Blog, Donn Zaretsky points to Gaylord v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
The verdict was eagerly anticipated, not just by lawyers and court watchers, but also by activists and a broad cross-section of ordinary people. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:12 pm
Ponce v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:17 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
A7171A
Abbate (MS) -- Provides procedures for resolution of disputes between a public employer and Suffolk county probation officers Same as S 4872 BLURB : Civ Serv. res ds Sflk Cty pk polLast Act: 04/24/09 amend and recommit to governmental employees04/24/09 print number 7171aA7196A
Weisenberg -- Creates the mandatory ignition interlock program; repealer Same as S 27-B BLURB : V & T L. mand ignition interlock Last Act: 04/24/09 amend and… [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:33 am
Supreme Court is relatively helpless without a Marbury v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
For example, the ending lyrics, which pick up on my observation regarding Marsh v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:26 am
Moreno (1973) and Romer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Other taxes, such as Stamp duty, business tax, land appreciation tax, and other indirect taxes are not convered by the arrangement, and therefore, the liability for those mainland taxes still remain enforced. [26] V. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 3:11 am
**See alsoIs the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp? [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:36 pm
" This is the very same nonsensical victim-blaming rhetoric the Supreme Court used more than a hundred years ago in Plessy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
See Eurowest Cinemas LLC v. [read post]
