Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)" Results 741 - 760 of 2,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm by Steven M. Sweat
The California Supreme Court recently ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm by Steven M. Sweat
The California Supreme Court recently ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
The CRTC has the relevant powers of a court of superior jurisdiction and already makes decisions that affect the fundamental freedoms of Canadians. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:38 pm by Daniel Nazer
This test, from a California Supreme Court case called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by INFORRM
On 3 April 2018 the California Supreme Court will hear oral submissions in a case of Hassell v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Marx in 1875 As Marx pointed out, the success of such a system depends on a political and juridical system that valorizes and protects private property and the amassing of wealth and assets, as nicely combined in the Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am by David Post
" And third, we now know exactly what the Agreement said, because Daniels has put it into the public record, appending it to a Complaint she recently filed in CA Superior Court seeking a declaration that the Agreement is invalid and unenforceable [more on this suit below]. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The court explored a tricky concept here – there was nothing that was completely on point – relying on Niederlehner v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:57 am by Senta F. Rhodes
 Or to put it another way, the courts have said that a landowner doesn’t need to warn people of “apparent hazards or circumstances of which” the person has equal or superior knowledge. [read post]