Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 741 - 760
of 55,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am
Will that new-found power help to relieve communities of their burdens? [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:05 am
In Hewitt v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:46 am
And things are moving: just today (July 2), the Court remanded nine cases “for further consideration in light of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:52 am
See Doe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:40 am
Under the Supreme Court’s ruling in yesterday’s Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:22 am
For example, in his famous concurrence to Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s recent Sheetz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 3:40 am
It’s unclear whether the reaction to the decision is the most inflamed ever, but it’s certainly close enough that it would not be hyperbolic to say the 5-1-3 decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
Mojave Pistachio, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Is this permissible given the judicial concern about the separation of powers? [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Moyle v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
(An example of such a phenomenon this year is the Moore v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:19 pm
Pix credit here 新华社研究院the Xinhua News Agency Research Institute has recently circulated ( 更好赋能中国繁荣世界——新质生产力的理论贡献和实践价值] (Better empowering China to prosper the world - the theoretical contribution and practical value of new productivity (20 June 2024))--a fairly… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:29 pm
It is a shocking expansion of presidential power to benefit Trump that transforms the presidency — and, with it, the nation…” See also New York Magazine, The Intelligencer: “…But the decision in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 4:36 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:24 pm
In Moody v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 2:34 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:48 pm
Trump v. [read post]