Search for: "Price v. Superior Court" Results 741 - 760 of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
The Court summarily reversed in yet another qualified immunity case, Taylor v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Quebec Court of Appeal rejects BC Court of Appeal passing-on defence decisions in Pro-Sys and Sun-Rype The Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Quebec Court of Appeal rejects BC Court of Appeal passing-on defence decisions in Pro-Sys and Sun-Rype The Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Statements implying superiority where the differences in adverse reactions are not clinically meaningful would be misleading. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by Susan Brenner
I appreciate your patience in trying to get a good price. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/63001-6.pub.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals In Re Price: The Court denied Mr. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[D]omestic flanges are considered by some to be superior to foreign flanges and command a price premium. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a motion filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Commercial List on August 11, 2017, the lawyer for Retirees of Sears Canada cited s. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
(Docket Report) Google Adwords do not infringe patent requiring ‘price-determining activity’: Performance Pricing, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am by Peter Mahler
The court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the dissolution claim is non-arbitrable because under the dissolution statute “only the superior court may grant such relief,” adding that nothing in the statute suggests the power to dissolve lies exclusively with the courts “or that parties may not agree to submit partnership dissolution and accounting disputes to arbitration. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Apple retains the right to withdraw from the settlement in the event an excessive number of requests for exclusion are received.The Court will hold a hearing in this case (Johnson v. [read post]