Search for: "Quality Courts United v. Quality Courts"
Results 741 - 760
of 4,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
Three case studies are presented, including the restoration of the Everglades wetland ecosystem (as considered by the United States Supreme Court in 2004 in South Florida Water Management District v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:14 am
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit heard arguments on Appeal from a 2009 decision by the Northern District of Alabama in University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
March v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
March v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:32 am
In UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
That ‘extended’ form of passing off, recognised by the United Kingdom courts, accordingly enables several traders to have rights over a sign which has acquired a reputation on the market". [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:28 pm
Id.; United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 9:25 am
An important decision, Serco, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
“Gibbons v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 9:04 am
This Townley v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
(Decision: The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer – PDF). [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:41 am
Facts: This case (Alexander et al v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
Read his amicus brief in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:31 pm
" The previous case cited -- United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:32 am
Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:30 am
Id.The United States Supreme Court found such an intent in the Lanham Act inSteele v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 5:02 pm
The starting point for the Grand Chamber’s assessment was that ‘[t]he notion of “quality of the law” requires, as a corollary of the foreseeability test, that the law be compatible with the rule of law; it thus implies that there must be adequate safeguards in domestic law against arbitrary interferences by public authorities (see Malone v. the United Kingdom, and Olsson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm
Both Congress and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
