Search for: "REED v. STATE" Results 741 - 760 of 2,139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Charles Sartain
Samaan If you deny the administrative state’s need to dominate the most mundane aspects of your everyday life, consider Louisiana, et al  v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Toby Lovett, Olswang LLP
Supreme Court Rank was granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court and the case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge on 21 April 2015, which can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
The Lord Advocate states the Government is not able to address all elements of uncertainty but this is a time limited measure. 1535: The Lord Advocate in response to a question from Lord Reed states that a benefit is that discounting cannot be made as with excise duty. 1531: The Lord Advocate submits the measure is easy to understand and enforce. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting in Courtroom 1 today and listed for two days is G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, to be heard by L Hale, L Wilson, L Sumption, L Reed and L Hodge. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Shauneen Werlinger discusses the Court’s orders granting certiorari, vacating the decision below, and remanding three cases for further consideration of this month’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:41 am by Tyler Gillett
Whether the restriction at issue is content-based depends on how the Justices decide to apply the ruling in Reed v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm by Venkat
Reed Plaintiff Can't be Forced to Accept Defense Counsel's Facebook Friend Request in Personal Injury Case -- Piccolo v. [read post]