Search for: "ROBERT ROE"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority, emphasizing the time that had elapsed since Section 4’s formula was created. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 8:10 am
If Roe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
” At The Atlantic, Leah Litman writes that “[t]he briefing in [June Medical] provides a glimpse into how a ruling for Louisiana could allow states to end legal abortion without overruling Roe—and also allow the Court to test the waters on whether to ultimately overturn Roe. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:33 pm
And Joan Biskupic of CNN reports that “Abortion case adds to turmoil facing Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Roberts’s outstanding work drew the attention of White House counsel Fred Fielding, who recruited Roberts to his staff in 1982. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Roberts, Jr., because he may well hold the deciding vote this time. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Both sides in the debate over abortion rights are laser-focused on whether the justices will overrule the decisions in Roe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Hamilton is the Robert A. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
This term suggests that the court, under Chief Justice John Roberts’ stewardship, may tread carefully. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
The post Symposium: <em>Roe</em> … or wait? [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
My own mentor, Robert McCloskey, many years ago argued that all major Supreme Court decisions were ultimately evaluated against the quite separate categories first of what Lessig calls legal “fidelity,” i.e., the persuasiveness of the strictly legal arguments that are offered; second, the institutional and political contexts within which the Court is acting and its own recognition that it is ill-advised to be either too innovative or, indeed, static in its legal… [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
It may also explain why Roberts decided (perhaps at the last minute?) [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
Supporters of Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
First, I did not posit Gary Lawson, Robert Bork, or Edwin Meese as the dependent variables in this book. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm
Second, what the Court has been doing under Chief Justice Roberts is very damaging to American decency and democracy. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Board of Education unsettled valuable patterns of race-based social relations in the American South (on this Calvin TerBeek's ongoing research on the National Review is quite illuminating), and later by a related concern that Roe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:51 am
Well, he guards Roe. [read post]
30 May 2019, 5:00 am
“The last time the Supreme Court was invited to overturn Roe v. [read post]
