Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States" Results 741 - 760 of 1,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm by Michael Lowe
  The Attorney General of the United States serves the USSC in an “ex officio” capacity (he cannot vote). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:55 am by admin
Commenting on the same case, The TTABlog observes:  “Applicant submitted substantial evidence regarding the strict regulations governing alcoholic beverages in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the Justice Department in their mission to apprehend and deport thousands of undocumented California residents. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the Justice Department in their mission to apprehend and deport thousands of undocumented California residents. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:43 am by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  This test was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Noting CEQA’s general rule that the baseline must reflect physical conditions at the time environmental analysis begins (citing CEQA Guidelines, § 15125; Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]