Search for: "Robinson v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
On the one hand, we have Robinson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
On the one hand, we have Robinson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
On the one hand, we have Robinson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:10 am
Also involved in the case was my partner, Mark Robinson. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
Robinson is co-director of the Program in Press, Law and Democracy at the Manship School of Mass Communication at Louisiana State University. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
The case is Sipuel v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Gerard Robinson urges the Court to grant rehearing in Friedrichs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
Mr Hay sued in libel, stating that the publications had caused serious damage to his reputation and that he had lost bookings as a self-employed tattooist as a result. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:48 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Carney v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:29 pm
In Bosnia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
Robinson Prop. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 6:01 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 4:05 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
