Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. C."
Results 741 - 760
of 27,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2007, 5:51 am
It is simple as Do, Re, Mi; A,B,C; 1, 2, 3, Baby, you and me.After noting that CAFA is a positive development for pharmaceutical and medical device manufactures, they first looked at the impact of CAFA on federal court resources as tracked by the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Silva, decided today by a New York intermediate appellate court, in an opinion by Justice Julio Rodriguez III: The primary issue on this appeal is the scope of "public interest" as defined in the 2020 amendments to New York State's anti-strategic lawsuit against public participation (anti-SLAPP) statute. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 8:07 pm
This information should be of interest to consumers, plaintiff attorneys,The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) , The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), The Departments of Consumer Affairs in All 50 states of the United States, Associations of Judges and Attorneys General. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 11:01 pm
XII, § 10(C) and La.Rev.Stat. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:50 pm
We identify the following passages of the case-law binding on us as particularly apposite in the identification of the test for Article 15 (c) protection in the present case: “The Article seeks to elevate the state practice of not returning unsuccessful asylum seekers to war zones or situations of armed anarchy for reasons of common humanity into a minimum standard (QD at [21]). [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:55 am
Rick C. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
§ 2232(c). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
SCOTUS has spoken on S&C's screw-up. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:09 am
Today's orders list noted that both Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch (the one justice to have served in a western state) would have voted to grant certiorari. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:14 am
George C. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:45 pm
C, and to Mrs. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from John C. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:28 pm
Professor Joshua C. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:46 am
Furthermore, the federal interest in regulating malpractice was outweighed by the state interest. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
Law Lessons from KAREN C. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:18 pm
The Plaintiff, Sandra C. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:56 pm
Florida Statutes Section 542.335(c) states in pertinent part that, “[a] person seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant…shall plead and prove that the contractually specified restraint is reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate business interest or interests justifying the restriction. [read post]
