Search for: "STATE v. ALES"
Results 741 - 760
of 18,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 8:26 pm
In the December 2019 Guidance, FDA writes that the clinical context for a disease (i.e., its rarity, its seriousness or life-threatening nature, and its unmet medical need) inform how much uncertainty the FDA will accept in terms of what constitutes an adequate and well-controlled trial (see Section V of that guidance available here). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
Doe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 8:21 am
., STATE GOV’T. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
Grover, The Court's Role in Upholding Inter- Generational Obligations Respecting the Child's Right to Truth: Juliana v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm
FIKRE, YONAS 22-1238 UNITED STATES TRUSTEE V. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
Cuba represents a most interesting variant of Marxist-Leninist state organization. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 12:58 pm
Diego Morales, et al. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 11:59 am
(Section 1983; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Williams, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:05 am
The petition had been filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:59 am
A version of this argument spilled out in public in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
The order to dismiss the Qualcomm class action(s) came one day after Judge Corley also made a decision (in a class-action matter that does not involve Qualcomm but also followed an FTC action) relating in part to yours truly's communications with Microsoft: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Here are the facts as stated in the Fourth Circuit's opinion in Rose v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
(The Doe v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
County of Sacramento, et al. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; 638 Contract) United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:56 am
STATE OF MARYLAND, et al. appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
