Search for: "STATE v. ARNOLD"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
United States, according to Bloomberg News. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:02 pm
In Tiverton Bd. of License Comm’rs. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
In the Virginia case—titled Landini v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:39 am
Then, in the wake of a lawsuit brought against then-Durham County prosecutor James Hardin, Jr., Simeon v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
On the same blog, IPKat team member Jeremy notes an extempore decision of Mr Justice Arnold on the difficult question of controlling uncapped costs in patent proceedings that are more easily afforded by one party than another, in Canon v Badger. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
The same patent was previously held invalid by the UK Courts for lack of novelty as a result an invalid priority right in Novartis v Hospira (see [2013 EWCA 516 (Pat.) and [2013] EWCA Civ 1663). [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Ohio “officially” signed on to the movement in 1993 in Arnold v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
[1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
In a decision that is only moderately Arnoldian (139 paragraphs), Mr Justice Arnold refused today to grant an interim injunction that Warner Lambert had requested against Actavis [Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 January 2015)]. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am
” An Ohio state court disagreed, ruling last year that Auto-Owners had no duty to defend G & K under the policy. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:51 am
Ohio (1969) and Hess v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:06 am
Her Majesty the Queen v. [read post]
