Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 4,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
  In the United State Supreme Court, the State’s counsel, Joesph Maziarz, placed great emphasis on the fact that Belton was settled precedent and the need for a clear, bright-line rule. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Jon
What does the privileges and immunities of United States citizenship embrace? [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:06 am by Jeffrey Brown
This week, Cybercrime Review is featuring a series of posts that takes a look at how federal and state courts are applying the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
HamiltonSecession and Breach of Compact:  The Law of Nature Meets the United States ConstitutionStephen C. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm by Allie
  It has been rendered the solemn duty of the Supreme Court of the United States, laid upon it by Congress in pursuance of the Federal Government’s power to regulate Commerce with foregin Nations, and among the several states, U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
The Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
United States - in which, according to Justice Scalia, the Court held that "a thing may be within in the letter of the statute and yet not within the statute, because not within its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers - "arises, Phoenix-like, from the ashes. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
United States, the Supreme Court wrestled with how to make sense of what went on behind closed doors in a jury deliberation that produced several acquittals but also deadlocked on other factually related counts. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, the first case in which Justices Kagan and Sotomayor disagreed on the judgment. [read post]