Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 741 - 760
of 6,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2013, 1:23 pm
Cite: Sanders v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Cheryl BeiseA seller of parody tote bags that prevailed on trademark infringement, dilution, and copyright infringement claims brought by Louis Vuitton was not entitled to recover attorney fees. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:16 pm
Nebraska Court of Appeals finds sale of ongoing business that comprised real estate, buildings fixtures and goods was not subject to UCC Article 2 on Sales; however court affirms judgment in favor of seller because buyer of business waived condition precedent for an inventory of goods and inventory remaining after sale.MBH, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:21 pm
Lucky 7 v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Lance v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
TIffany sued eBay claiming that eBay was liable for trademark infringement and false advertising because sellers sold counterfeit merchandise on eBay's site. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:40 pm
’” Farmer v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:34 pm
Alexander Shukh v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 6:57 pm
Miller v. [read post]
COA Opinion: Seller’s agent can be liable for misstatement about environmental condition of property
20 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
In Alferi v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm
In Ramirez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:58 am
On January 10, 2012, the Court of Appeals vacated its earlier order and issued a new opinion in Alfieri v Bertorelli, No. 297733. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:02 am
In Freeman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 11:05 am
The case is entitled Kenney v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 10:52 am
The case is entitled Kenney v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:23 pm
” (Ginn v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:23 pm
” (Ginn v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:53 am
See, Silva v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:24 pm
Outdoor Central, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:37 am
Chief Justice McLachlin of a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada had the following to say on user rights in the 2004 in the CCH Canadian v. [read post]
